4.1 Article

'We have to make the tourists happy'; orphanage tourism in Siem Reap, Cambodia through the children's own voices

期刊

CHILDRENS GEOGRAPHIES
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 51-63

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2021.1913481

关键词

Siem Reap; Cambodia; orphanage tourism; child-focused participatory research; children’ s rights; child migration; unfreedoms

资金

  1. University of the Sunshine Coast for the Research Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the lived experiences of children in a performance-based orphanage in Siem Reap, Cambodia, collecting their narratives through child-focused participatory research. The findings provided insights into the children's lives, aspirations, and the orphanage's impact on their rights and human development, with implications for communities and organizations advocating children's rights-based development and educational initiatives.
This paper examines the lived experiences of children who interacted with tourists in a performance-based orphanage in Siem Reap, Cambodia. The orphanage was perceived by poor Cambodians as the only opportunity for their children to access food and education and a place to care for children when parents migrated for work. In recent years, however, orphanages in the majority world have come under increasing international pressure because many are associated with children's rights abuses. As a result, the Cambodian Government committed to closing many orphanages and reintegrating 30 per cent of institutionalised children back into their family's care. The children's narratives were collected through child-focused participatory research. The findings provide a deeper understanding of the children's lives, their aspirations and the extent to which the orphanage provided for their rights and human development. The findings are pertinent for other communities and organisations advocating children's rights-based development and educational initiatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据