4.4 Article

My Entire World Stopped: College Students' Psychosocial and Academic Frustrations during the COVID-19 Pandemic

期刊

APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 1069-1090

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11482-021-09948-0

关键词

College student; COVID-19; Academic; University; Psychosocial; Well-being

资金

  1. West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station [WVA00689, WVA00721]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted college attending young adults' normal life and resulted in increased frustration in academic and psychosocial aspects. Data collected from an online survey showed significant numbers of students reporting fair, poor, or very poor learning and health conditions after the pandemic, with frustrations expressed in various aspects of life.
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted normalcy for college attending young adults which resulted in a loss of the campus environment and classroom setting. This change in setting may interfere with a student's personal and academic wellbeing. This study used an online survey to evaluate college students' academic and psychosocial frustrations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected from March-April 2020 at a land-grant university in the Appalachian region. Data were available from 2643 undergraduate and graduate students. There was a 65.8% and 15.7% increase in the number of students who reported their learning and health as fair, poor, or very poor after the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively. Qualitative responses were coded and 8 themes and 24 subthemes emerged. College students expressed frustrations regarding technology, classwork, research, family, social, emotional, behavioral, and financial aspects of life. These results can be used by higher education administration, faculty, and staff when planning for online courses. Ensuring that student frustrations and barriers to success are recognized and considered may help prevent students departing from higher education during this time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据