The politics of genetic technoscience for conservation: The case of blight-resistant American chestnut

Innovations in genetics and genomics have been heavily critiqued as technologies that have widely supported the privatization and commodification of natural resources. However, emerging applications of these tools to ecological restoration challenge narratives that cast genetic technoscience as inevitably enrolled in the enactment and extension of neoliberal capitalism. In this paper, we draw on Langdon Winner's theory of technological politics to suggest that the context in which genetic technologies are developed and deployed matters for their political outcomes. We describe how genetic approaches to the restoration of functionally extinct American chestnut trees-by non-profit organizations, for the restoration of a wild, heritage forest species, and with unconventional intellectual property protections-are challenging precedents in the political economy of plant biotechnology. Through participant observation, interviews with scientists, and historical analysis, we employ the theoretical lens provided by Karl Polanyi's double movement to describe how the anticipations and agency of the developers of blight-resistant American chestnut trees, combined with chestnut biology and the context of restoration, have thus far resisted key forms of the genetic privatization and commodification of chestnut germplasm. Still, the politics of blight-resistant American chestnut remain incomplete and undetermined; we thus call upon scholars to use the uneven and socially constructed character of both technologies and neoliberalism to help shape this and other applications of genetic technoscience for conservation.

Automated summary

This paper discusses how the political outcomes of genetic technologies depend on the context in which they are developed and deployed, using the example of genetic approaches to restoring functionally extinct American chestnut trees. It highlights the challenges to genetic privatization and commodification in this restoration effort and calls upon scholars to shape the applications of genetic technoscience for conservation by leveraging the uneven nature of both technologies and neoliberalism.