4.7 Article

Kinetic analysis of resin binder for casting in combustion decomposition process

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 147, 期 11, 页码 6323-6336

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-021-10902-3

关键词

Waste foundry sand; Hot-reclamation process; TG-DTA; TG-MS Activation energy; Reaction model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used TG-DTA technology to analyze the combustion decomposition process of different resin binders, obtaining parameters such as residual mass and activation energy at high temperatures, providing important data support for thermal reclamation.
Random stacking of waste foundry sand will cause great environmental pollution, so it is necessary to recycle the waste foundry sand produced by resin-bonded sand technology by hot-reclamation to eliminate the residual resin on its surface. The study of thermodynamics analysis of resin binder for casting in combustion decomposition process can provide theoretical support for thermal reclamation. In this paper, TG-DTA technology was applied to measure TG, TGA, DTG curves of the three kinds of resin binders at 0-800 degrees C (furan resin binder, phenolic urethane resin binder and alkaline phenolic resin binder). The ignition point, reaction peak temperature, activation energy, mode function and other parameters of the three resin binders were calculated by the curves, and conclusions are as follows: (1) Furan resin binder, phenolic urethane resin binder and alkaline phenolic resin binder were heated to 800 degrees C in air at a heating rate of 15 degrees C min(-1), and their residual mass was 9.8%, 2.7% and 33.7%, respectively; (2) the highest activation energy of furan resin binder, phenolic urethane resin binder and alkaline phenolic resin binder was 82.35 kJ mol(-1), 90.77 kJ mol(-1) and 335.77 kJ mol(-1), respectively; (3) the reaction mode of three resin binders in each stage is Acceleratory alpha-time(n = 1), f(alpha) = alpha, G(alpha) = ln alpha.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据