4.8 Review

Li4Ti5O12 spinel anode: Fundamentals and advances in rechargeable batteries

期刊

INFOMAT
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/inf2.12228

关键词

diffusion rates; Li4Ti5O12; lithium-ion batteries; overlithiation; surface engineering

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875284, 22075320, 52073161]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2019YFE0100200, 2019YFA0705703]
  3. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [2019Z02UTY06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Li4Ti5O12 (LTO) spinel material is a promising anode material for lithium-ion batteries due to its good cycle stability and rate capability, but faces challenges such as low capacity and gassing issue. Recent studies suggest that LTO performance can be further improved through novel strategies, shedding light on the future research direction of LTO anodes.
The Li4Ti5O12 (LTO) spinel material, ranking at the second large market share after graphite, is a promising anode material for lithium-ion batteries due to its good cycle stability, rate capability, and safety with both conventional and low-temperature electrolytes. However, several critical challenges, such as the low capacity and gassing issue, hindered the wide applications of LTO anode. Recent progress indicated that the LTO performances are possible to be further improved by novel strategies, such as heterogeneous phase control, surface engineering, or overlithiation. To rethink and develop advanced LTO anodes, this review intensively associates the performances and modification strategies with the electronics/crystal structures. From a thermodynamic/kinetic point of view, we summarized the data obtained from recently developed characterization techniques, and the results of electrochemical performances and fundamental structures of LTO to potentially address several key challenges and issues toward advanced LTO anodes. As a result, light is shed on the future research direction of the LTO anodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据