4.8 Article

USP19 (ubiquitin specific peptidase 19) promotes TBK1 (TANK-binding kinase 1) degradation via chaperone-mediated autophagy

期刊

AUTOPHAGY
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 891-908

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1963155

关键词

Antiviral immunity; autophagic degradation; hspa8; hsc70; lamp2a; type i interferon

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1801283, 31870908, 31670914]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LZ17H100001]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission [JCYJ20180507182253653]
  4. Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Program [2019B030301009]
  5. SZU Top Ranking Project [86000000210]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that USP19 plays a crucial role in promoting TBK1 lysosomal degradation through chaperone-mediated autophagy, contributing to immune response and infectious diseases. This study uncovers a novel role for USP19 in CMA-mediated TBK1 degradation.
TBK1 (TANK-binding kinase 1) is an essential receptor protein required for the innate immune response, but the mechanisms underlying TBK1 stability, especially those regulated via autophagy, remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that USP19 (ubiquitin specific peptidase 19) interacts with and promotes TBK1 lysosomal degradation via chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). We observed that TBK1 had a canonical CMA motif, knocking down key proteins involved in CMA (HSPA8/HSC70 or LAMP2A) or inhibiting CMA-prevented USP19-mediated TBK1 degradation. Furthermore, USP19 deficiency in macrophages caused an elevation of TBK1 and the activation of the type-I interferon signaling pathway after vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) infection. Consistently, macrophage-specific usp19 knockout in mice resulted in attenuated VSV replication and resistance to VSV infection in vivo. Altogether, our results suggest that USP19 is a key regulator of TBK1 and uncovers a previously uncharacterized role for USP19 in CMA-mediated TBK1 degradation and infectious diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据