4.1 Article

Revision of European Brachysira species (Brachysiraceae, Bacillariophyta): III. Species formerly included in the Brachysira serians-complex

期刊

BOTANY LETTERS
卷 169, 期 1, 页码 83-105

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23818107.2021.1941250

关键词

Brachysira; environmental monitoring; Europe; morphology; taxonomy; type material

资金

  1. LIST - Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides a detailed description of the morphology of European Brachysira serians and the B. brebissonii-intermedia complex, reevaluates the type material, and describes two new species to clarify the taxonomic identity.
This third paper revising the European Brachysira species deals with Brachysira serians and the closely related B. brebissonii-intermedia complex. The morphology of these species is characterised in greater detail than before based on a combination of analyses of original type material and additional historic and modern samples. All taxa in this complex are typically found in oligotrophic, acidic environments. The largest species in this complex are B. serians and B. wygaschii, which both possess a distinct Voigt discordance. Although they often co-occur, differences in their valve outline and dimensions are distinctive. The type material of Brachysira brebissonii is restudied and differs from a widespread use of this species name in Europe. As a result, Anomoeoneis intermedia, described from Denmark, is considered a more recent heterotypic synonym of B. brebissonii. Two new species are described to clarify the taxonomic identity of the B. brebissonii-intermedia species complex: B. elisabethiana Van de Vijver, C.E.Wetzel & Ector, sp. nov. and B. confusa Van de Vijver, R.L.Albert, B.Kennedy & Kusber, sp. nov. The type material of the morphologically similar B. arctoborealis from North America is studied for comparison. The ecological preferences of all the reported taxa are derived from the accompanying diatom flora in the investigated samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据