3.8 Article

Simulating language knowledge across the EU: language regimes, language learning and consequences for linguistic disenfranchisement

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 537-563

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s42001-021-00137-5

关键词

Languages; Europe; Linguistic disenfranchisement; Simulation

资金

  1. Universite de Geneve
  2. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [613344]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [181554]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper aims to develop a simulation model to test different language education orientations and their impact on linguistic disenfranchisement among the EU population, with the goal of assisting EU policymakers in making informed decisions regarding language practices and education policies.
The objective of this paper is to develop an simulation model able to test different language education orientations and their consequences for the EU population in terms of linguistic disenfranchisement, that is, the inability of citizens to understand EU documents and parliamentary discussions should their native language(s) no longer be official. I will focus on the impact of linguistic distance and language learning. Ideally, this model would be a tool to help EU policy makers make informed decisions about language practices and education policies, taking into account their consequences in terms of diversity and linguistic disenfranchisement. The model can be used to force agents to make certain choices in terms of language skills acquisition. The user can then go on to compare different scenarios in which language skills are acquired according to different rationales. The idea is that, by forcing agents to adopt certain language learning strategies, the model user can simulate policies promoting the acquisition of language skills and get an idea of their impact. In this way, the model allows not only to sketch various scenarios of the evolution of language skills among EU citizens, but also to estimate the level of disenfranchisement in each of these scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据