4.5 Article

Blockchain Based Enhanced ERP Transaction Integrity Architecture and PoET Consensus

期刊

CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 1089-1109

出版社

TECH SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2022.019416

关键词

Transaction security; enterprise systems; blockchain; transaction integrity; hyperledger sawtooth; PoET consensus

资金

  1. National University of Sciences and Technology
  2. National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the integration of database and Blockchain to address the single point of failure issue in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software. The study found that using a private permissioned Blockchain with Proof of Elapsed Time consensus is more suitable for controlling and monitoring access in ERP systems, and to address the bottleneck issue of transaction processing rates (TPR) in Blockchain consensus.
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software is extensively used for the management of business processes. ERP offers a system of integrated applications with a shared central database. Storing all business-critical information in a central place raises various issues such as data integrity assurance and a single point of failure, which makes the database vulnerable. This paper investigates database and Blockchain integration, where the Blockchain network works in synchronization with the database system, and offers a mechanism to validate the transactions and ensure data integrity. Limited research exists on Blockchain-based solutions for the single point of failure in ERP. We established in our study that for concurrent access control and monitoring of ERP, private permissioned Blockchain using Proof of Elapsed Time consensus is more suitable. The study also investigated the bottleneck issue of transaction processing rates (TPR) of Blockchain consensus, specifically ERP's TPR. The paper presents system architecture that integrates Blockchain with an ERP system using an application interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据