4.7 Article

Volumetric morphometry reveals spindle width as the best predictor of mammalian spindle scaling

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 221, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202106170

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [RE 3925/1-1]
  2. Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union (iNEXT grant) [653706, PID 3503]
  3. IRI Life Sciences (Humboldt-Universitadt zu Berlin, Excellence Initiative/Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The function of cellular structures at the mesoscale is determined by their geometry and proportionality to cell size. The mitotic spindle is a good example of how the length and shape of intracellular organelles are important. New imaging techniques and volumetric data analysis provide insights into scaling relations across different species.
The function of cellular structures at the mesoscale is dependent on their geometry and proportionality to cell size. The mitotic spindle is a good example why length and shape of intracellular organelles matter. Spindle length determines the distance over which chromosomes will segregate, and spindle shape ensures bipolarity. While we still lack a systematic and quantitative understanding of subcellular morphology, new imaging techniques and volumetric data analysis promise novel insights into scaling relations across different species. Here, we introduce Spindle3D, an open-source plug-in that allows for the quantitative, consistent, and automated analysis of 3D fluorescent data of spindles and chromatin. We systematically analyze different mammalian cell types, including somatic cells, stem cells, and one- and two-cell embryos, to derive volumetric relations of spindle, chromatin, and the cell. Taken together, our data indicate that mitotic spindle width is a robust indicator of spindle volume, which correlates linearly with chromatin and cell volume both within single cell types and across mammalian species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据