4.7 Article

Flammability and thermal analysis of thermoplastic polyurethane/DOPO derivative/sepiolite composites

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 147, 期 15, 页码 8225-8234

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-021-11105-6

关键词

Sepiolite; DOPO derivative; Flame retardancy; Thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer; Thermal stability

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of Guizhou [2019/2026]
  2. Fundamental Research Key Project of Guizhou Province [20201Z044]
  3. Guizhou Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars [20195665]
  4. Open Fund Program of Southwest University of Science and Technology [18zxgk01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examined the flammability, thermal, and mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)/DOPO derivative (DiDOPO)/sepiolite composites fabricated by a melt blending process. The TPUSEP3 composite achieved UL-94 V0 classes and showed enhanced flexural strength. The presence of sepiolite and DiDOPO led to improvements in the fire performance of the composites.
Thermoplastic polyurethane was an important polymer and widely used in many fields. However, poor fire performance significantly inhibits its further application. In this study, the flammability, thermal and mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)/DOPO derivative (DiDOPO)/sepiolite composites, fabricated by a melt blending process, were examined based on the sepiolite content. TPUSEP3 has achieved UL-94 V0 classes and LOI 34.4%. Micro-scale combustion calorimeter shows that TPU/DiDOPO/sepiolite composites possess an excellent fire performance. Flexural strength of TPUSEP3 has enhanced to 48.3 MPa which indicated the rigidity of composites has significantly improved. In addition, the scanning electronic microscopy images of the external surface of the carbon layer of composites show a very compact structure. Sepiolite and DiDOPO change the decomposition process of composites lead to the decrease of E-a values of TPU/DiDOPO/sepiolite composites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据