4.6 Review

Tumor organoids for cancer research and personalized medicine

期刊

CANCER BIOLOGY & MEDICINE
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

CHINA ANTI-CANCER ASSOC
DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0335

关键词

Organoids; cancer research; heterogeneity; personalized medicine; clinical cancer therapy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671421, 82030079, 82003187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organoids are three-dimensional culture systems derived from various types of stem cells, capable of mimicking organ development and pathological processes. By establishing organoid biobanks, representing different stages of diseases such as cancer, intra- and interpatient heterogeneities can be maintained. This technology has the potential to revolutionize drug screening and personalized medicine.
Organoids are three-dimensional culture systems generated from embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, and adult stem cells. They are capable of cell proliferation, differentiation, and self-renewal. Upon stimulation by signal factors and/or growth factors, organoids self-assemble to replicate the morphological and structural characteristics of the corresponding organs. They provide an extraordinary platform for investigating organ development and mimicking pathological processes. Organoid biobanks derived from a wide range of carcinomas have been established to represent different lesions or stages of clinical tumors. Importantly, genomic and transcriptomic analyses have confirmed maintenance of intra- and interpatient heterogeneities in organoids. Therefore, this technology has the potential to revolutionize drug screening and personalized medicine. In this review, we summarized the characteristics and applications of organoids in cancer research by the establishment of organoid biobanks directly from tumor organoids or from genetically modified non-cancerous organoids. We also analyzed the current state of organoid applications in drug screening and personalized medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据