4.5 Review

Femtosecond laser-produced optical absorbers for solar-thermal energy harvesting

期刊

ECOMAT
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eom2.12161

关键词

black metals; broadband absorbers; selective solar absorbers; solar-thermal technologies

资金

  1. US Army Research Office [W911NF-15-1-0319]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-009181]
  3. National Science Foundation: Partnership for Innovation [1701163]
  4. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1701163] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review focuses on femtosecond-laser induced broadband and selective solar absorbers and their applications in solar thermoelectric generators and solar-thermal water purification. The article discusses the control methods of surface structures during laser processing and the effects of different structures on optical absorption and emission.
Optical absorbers are a key component in all solar-thermal energy technologies. Cermet-based solar absorbers are commonly used in solar-thermal applications. However, due to their multilayered structures, these absorbers have limited thermal conductivity and mechanical stability at the interfaces. Femtosecond laser processing is a single-step, environmentally friendly, and monolithic approach that can directly transform a metal surface to a solar absorber through surface patterning without adding additional weight, hazard, or complexity. In this review, we will focus on femtosecond-laser induced broadband and selective solar absorbers and their utilizations in solar thermoelectric generators and solar-thermal water purification. We will discuss the laser surface patterning and the procedure to control the size, distribution, and composition of the surface structures that are responsible for optical absorbance/emittance. Several multifunctional solar absorber surfaces produced by femtosecond-laser processing and their possible energy applications are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据