4.6 Article

Controllable morphology of Bi2S3 nanostructures formed via hydrothermal vulcanization of Bi2O3 thin-film layer and their photoelectrocatalytic performances

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 284-297

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/ntrev-2022-0016

关键词

hydrothermal vulcanization; sulfide nanostructure; photoelectrocatalyst

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan
  2. MOST [108-2221-E-019-034-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bi2S3 nanostructures with various morphologies were synthesized through hydrothermal vulcanization at different sulfur precursor concentrations. Bi2O3 thin-film layers were used as sacrificial templates, which resulted in controllable morphologies of Bi2S3 crystals. Among the various samples, Bi2S3 nanosheets exhibited superior photoactive ability.
Bi2S3 nanostructures with various morphologies were synthesized through hydrothermal vulcanization at different sulfur precursor (thiourea) concentrations. A 100 nm thick sputter-deposited Bi2O3 thin-film layer on a fluorine-doped tin oxide glass substrate was used as a sacrificial template layer. The etching of the Bi2O3 sacrificial template layer and the regrowth of Bi2S3 crystallites during hydrothermal vulcanization produced the different Bi2S3 nanostructure morphologies. The lowest sulfur precursor concentration (0.01 M) induced the formation of Bi2S3 nanosheets, whereas the Bi2S3 nanoribbons and nanowires were formed with increased sulfur precursor concentrations of 0.03 and 0.1 M, respectively. These results indicate that sputter-deposited Bi2O3 thin-film layers can be effectively used to form low-dimensional Bi2S3 crystals with controllable morphologies. Among the various Bi2S3 samples, the Bi2S3 nanosheets exhibited superior photoactive ability. The higher active surface area, surface defect density, light absorption capacity, and photo-induced charge separation ability of Bi2S3 nanosheets explain their superior photoelectrocatalytic degradation ability of rhodamine B dyes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据