4.6 Article

All-optical quantum simulation of ultrastrong optomechanics

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 105, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.013504

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12175061, 11822501, 11774087, 11935006]
  2. Hunan Science and Technology Plan Project [2017XK2018]
  3. Science and Tech-nology Innovation Program of Hunan Province [2020RC4047, 2021RC4029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an all-optical scheme to simulate ultrastrong optomechanical coupling based on a Fredkin-type interaction. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the enhanced optomechanical coupling can enter the single-photon strong-coupling and even ultrastrong-coupling regimes, enabling the creation of macroscopic quantum superposed states and the implementation of a weak-to-strong transition for quantum measurement in the system.
The observation of single-photon optomechanical effects is a desired task in cavity optomechanics. However, the realization of ultrastrong optomechanical interaction remains a big challenge. Here we present an all-optical scheme to simulate ultrastrong optomechanical coupling based on a Fredkin-type interaction, which consists of two exchange-coupled modes with the coupling strength depending on the photon number in another controller mode. This coupling enhancement is assisted by the displacement amplification according to the physical idea of the Bogoliubov approximation, which is realized by utilizing a strong driving to pump one of the two exchanging modes. Our numerical simulations demonstrate that the enhanced optomechanical coupling can enter the single-photon strong-coupling and even ultrastrong-coupling regimes. We also show the creation of macroscopic quantum superposed states and the implementation of a weak-to-strong transition for quantum measurement in this system. This work will pave the way to quantum simulation of single-photon optomechanical effects with current experimental platforms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据