4.8 Article

Architecture of the chloroplast PSI-NDH supercomplex in Hordeum vulgare

期刊

NATURE
卷 601, 期 7894, 页码 649-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04277-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0907600, 2018YFA0507700, 2017YFA0503700, 2017YFA0504803, 2019YFA0906300, 2021YFA1300403]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS [XDA26050402, XDB17000000]
  3. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of CAS [QYZDY-SSW-SMC003]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS [2020081]
  5. CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team [JCTD-2020-06]
  6. CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research [YSBR-004]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018XZZX001-13]
  8. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17H06434]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents the cryo-electron microscopy structures of a PSI-NDH supercomplex from barley, revealing the composition and interactions of its internal subunits. It provides a structural basis for further investigations on the functions and regulation of PSI-NDH-dependent cyclic electron transport (CET).
The chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase-like (NDH) complex is composed of at least 29 subunits and has an important role in mediating photosystem I (PSI) cyclic electron transport (CET)(1-3). The NDH complex associates with PSI to form the PSI-NDH supercomplex and fulfil its function. Here, we report cryo-electron microscopy structures of a PSI-NDH supercomplex from barley (Hordeum vulgare). The structures reveal that PSI-NDH is composed of two copies of the PSI-light-harvesting complex I (LHCI) subcomplex and one NDH complex. Two monomeric LHCI proteins, Lhca5 and Lhca6, mediate the binding of two PSI complexes to NDH. Ten plant chloroplast-specific NDH subunits are presented and their exact positions as well as their interactions with other subunits in NDH are elucidated. In all, this study provides a structural basis for further investigations on the functions and regulation of PSI-NDH-dependent CET.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据