4.4 Article

Bisphenol-A and Sleep Adequacy among Adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys

期刊

SLEEP
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 467-476

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.5665/sleep.5466

关键词

bisphenol-A; endocrine disruptor; sleep duration; sleep disorder; survey

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging (NIA/NIH/IRP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: To evaluate bisphenol-A (BPA) level and its relationship to sleep adequacy in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Methods: A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted using 2005-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey whereby data were collected using in-person interviews, physical examination and laboratory testing. BPA level was measured in urine samples and analyzed as loge-transformed variable and in quartiles (< 0.9 ng/mL; 0.9 to < 1.9 ng/mL; 1.9 to < 3.7 ng/mL; 3.7+ ng/mL). Sleep adequacy was operationalized with three questions: How much sleep do you usually get at night on weekdays or workdays?, Have you ever told a doctor or other health professionals that you have trouble sleeping? and Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you have a sleep disorder? Sleep duration was further categorized as (< 6 h, >= 6 h); (< 7 h, 7-8 h, > 8 h); (< 5 h, 5-6 h, 7-8 h, >= 9 h). Linear, binary, and ordinal logistic regression models were constructed. Results: Loge-transformed BPA level was inversely related to sleep duration defined, in hours, as a continuous variable, a dichotomous variable (>= 6, < 6), or an ordinal variable (>= 9, 7-8, 5-6, < 5), after adjustment for confounders. Help-seeking behavior for sleep problems and diagnosis with sleep disorders were not significantly associated with loge-transformed BPA level in fully adjusted models. Conclusions: Loge-transformed BPA level may be associated with fewer hours of sleep among U.S. adults, with implications for prevention. Further research involving diverse populations are needed to confirm these study findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据