3.8 Review

Genetic predisposition study of heart failure and its association with cardiomyopathy

期刊

EGYPTIAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 74, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s43044-022-00240-6

关键词

Heart failure; Cardiomyopathy; Genetic association; Hypertrophy; Ventricular ejection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heart failure is a clinical condition characterized by structural and functional defects in the myocardium, caused by genetic and environmental factors. Research on the genetic variants associated with cardiomyopathy provides a better understanding of the genetics aspect of heart failure and may contribute to personalized therapeutics in the future.
Heart failure (HF) is a clinical condition distinguished by structural and functional defects in the myocardium, which genetic and environmental factors can induce. HF is caused by various genetic factors that are both heterogeneous and complex. The incidence of HF varies depending on the definition and area, but it is calculated to be between 1 and 2% in developed countries. There are several factors associated with the progression of HF, ranging from coronary artery disease to hypertension, of which observed the most common genetic cause to be cardiomyopathy. The main objective of this study is to investigate heart failure and its association with cardiomyopathy with their genetic variants. The selected novel genes that have been linked to human inherited cardiomyopathy play a critical role in the pathogenesis and progression of HF. Research sources collected from the human gene mutation and several databases revealed that numerous genes are linked to cardiomyopathy and thus explained the hereditary influence of such a condition. Our findings support the understanding of the genetics aspect of HF and will provide more accurate evidence of the role of changing disease accuracy. Furthermore, a better knowledge of the molecular pathophysiology of genetically caused HF could contribute to the emergence of personalized therapeutics in future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据