4.0 Review

Multimodal sensing and therapeutic systems for wound healing and management: A review

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS REPORTS
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.snr.2022.100075

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-GM126831]
  2. National Science Foundation [ECCS-2113736]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wounds, especially chronic ones, have significant impacts on patients' quality of life and the healthcare industry. Monitoring and treating wounds using multimodal sensing and therapeutic systems, as well as utilizing machine learning and deep learning for data-driven assessment of the wound healing process, are crucial for accelerating wound healing and reducing patients' pain.
Wounds especially chronic ones significantly affect the quality of patients' life and present a severe financial burden for the healthcare industry. Timely and effective management of wounds, such as diagnosing wound parameters, treating various wound symptoms, and reducing infection at the wound noninvasively, is very important for accelerating wound healing and relieving patients' pain. Recent years have seen significant efforts dedicated to developing technologies for monitoring various biomarkers vital to the wound healing process including temperature, pressure, pH, and the infection status to assist with the diagnosis and treatment of wounds, as well as advanced wound therapies such as on-demand and local drug delivery. This review paper introduces recent progress on multimodal sensing and therapeutic systems for wound healing. Specifically, we focus on physical sensing (temperature, moisture, pressure, and strain), chemical sensing (pH, uric acid, and cytokine), as well as therapeutic systems for wound management (active drug delivery systems based on external stimulations and non-drug stimulations). In addition, leveraging advanced analytic techniques, i.e., machine learning and deep learning, for data-driven assessment and management of the wound healing process has been discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据