4.1 Article

How Academics and the Public Experienced Immersive Virtual Reality for Geo-Education

期刊

GEOSCIENCES
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences12010009

关键词

immersive virtual reality; geology; photogrammetry; education; Iceland; Santorini; Etna

资金

  1. MIUR [ACPR15T4_00098-Argo3D]
  2. 3DTeLC Erasmus + Project [2017-1-UK01-KA203-036719]
  3. EGU 2018 Public Engagement Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explored how users perceive the usefulness of immersive virtual reality in Earth Sciences teaching and communication, with most participants expressing willingness to repeat the experience and confirming its usefulness for geo-education purposes, especially students and academics.
Immersive virtual reality can potentially open up interesting geological sites to students, academics and others who may not have had the opportunity to visit such sites previously. We study how users perceive the usefulness of an immersive virtual reality approach applied to Earth Sciences teaching and communication. During nine immersive virtual reality-based events held in 2018 and 2019 in various locations (Vienna in Austria, Milan and Catania in Italy, Santorini in Greece), a large number of visitors had the opportunity to navigate, in immersive mode, across geological landscapes reconstructed by cutting-edge, unmanned aerial system-based photogrammetry techniques. The reconstructed virtual geological environments are specifically chosen virtual geosites, from Santorini (Greece), the North Volcanic Zone (Iceland), and Mt. Etna (Italy). Following the user experiences, we collected 459 questionnaires, with a large spread in participant age and cultural background. We find that the majority of respondents would be willing to repeat the immersive virtual reality experience, and importantly, most of the students and Earth Science academics who took part in the navigation confirmed the usefulness of this approach for geo-education purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据