4.6 Article

Impact of Routine Management Procedures on the Welfare of Suckling Piglets

期刊

VETERINARY SCIENCES
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9010032

关键词

age impact; animal welfare; animal health; castration; marking for identification; pain management; piglet processing; processing technique; tail docking; teeth resection

资金

  1. Schmid to the Faculty of Agriculture of the University of Bonn

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review investigates the implications of piglet processing on various parameters and identifies knowledge gaps. The most researched topics are tail docking and piglet castration, while marking for identification has been rarely addressed.
Piglets often undergo several painful treatments during the initial days of their lives. In this review, we investigate the acute (i.e., immediate), short-, and long-term implications of piglet processing on behavioral, physiological, clinical, and performance parameters, and how welfare impairments depend on performance instead of sham procedure, alternative techniques, or the age of the piglets. Welfare indicators that have been used to determine the least distressing procedures and knowledge gaps with regard to the procedures are identified and discussed. Tail docking and especially piglet castration have been the most researched topics, whereas marking for identification has been rarely addressed. Few or no studies have investigated the effects of teeth resection and tail docking on piglets of different age groups. Additionally, results are often found to be inconsistent, highlighting the need for additional research to determine the optimal age for processing. Studies comparing different processing techniques have produced contradictory results, but ear notching, teeth clipping, hot cautery tail docking, and tearing during castration have been determined to result in increased pain. Generally, a shorter procedure duration can reduce stress, with operator training having a distinct impact on piglet welfare during processing. As such, these topics should be further investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据