4.5 Article

Systematic study of fusion suppression for tightly bound projectiles at above-barrier energies

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 105, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.014609

关键词

-

资金

  1. IUAC, New Delhi, India
  2. DST-SERB [CRG/2020/000136]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present work investigates the effects of projectile breakup on fusion cross section and compares experimental data of different strongly bound projectiles, revealing an exponential relation between the breakup threshold and suppression factor.
The present work aims to explore the effects of projectile breakup on fusion cross section at energies near the Coulomb barrier to well above it. The complete fusion cross section for the strongly bound non-alpha-cluster projectile 14N in interaction with a 181Ta target was obtained by summing the experimentally measured channelby-channel cross section data of evaporated residues. The obtained total fusion cross section was compared with the theoretical code CCFULL and the results were found to be consistent with each other. Further, the experimental fusion function data on 181Ta target with 14N projectile were deduced and compared with those obtained for other strongly bound projectiles, viz., 12,13C, 16O, and 19F, in order to get some systematics in fusion reactions. The analysis of experimental fusion functions was performed within the framework of a benchmark curve called the universal fusion function (UFF). A suppression of about 5-25% with respect to UFF was observed for the presently studied systems at energies above the Coulomb barrier, indicating that the suppression is essentially due to the prompt breakup of the projectiles and is a strong function of breakup threshold of projectiles. The magnitude of such suppression was found to be lower for 14N projectile as compared to other strongly bound projectiles. Moreover, an interesting exponential relation between the experimentally deduced suppression factor and the breakup threshold of the projectile was obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据