4.7 Review

Exposure to inorganic arsenic can lead to gut microbe perturbations and hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

ACTA PHARMACEUTICA SINICA B
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 426-429

出版社

INST MATERIA MEDICA, CHINESE ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2016.07.011

关键词

Arsenic; Microbiome; Epigenetics; Liver cancer; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Gut microbiota; Lipopolysaccharide

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R21 AA022482] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK104656, P30 DK034989, R01 DK080440] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES025909] Funding Source: Medline
  4. BLRD VA [I01 BX002634] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenic is a carcinogenic environmental factor found in food and drinking water around the world. The mechanisms in which arsenic alters homeostasis are not fully understood. Over the past few decades, light has been shed on varying mechanisms in which arsenic induces cancer. Such mechanisms include gut microbe perturbations, genotoxic effects, and epigenetic modification. Gut microbe perturbations have been shown to increase the level of pathogen-associated molecular patterns such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) leading to uncontained inflammation. Increase in inflammation is the major factor in cirrhosis leading to hepatocellular carcinoma. Alterations in gut permeability and metabolites have also been observed as a fallout of arsenic induced gut microbe modification. The guts proximity and interaction through portal flow make the liver susceptible to gut perturbations and ensuing inflammatory responses. Genotoxic and epigenetic dysregulation induced by arsenic and its toxic metabolites present a more direct mechanism that works synergistically with gut microbe perturbations to induce the incidence of cancers. These pathways combined could be some of the main causes of arsenic-induced carcinogenesis. (C) 2016 Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据