4.5 Article

Bayesian parameter estimation in chiral effective field theory using the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 105, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.014004

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [758027]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2017-04234, 2018-05973]
  3. Swedish Research Council [2017-04234] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [758027] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The number of low-energy constants in chiral effective field theory grows rapidly with increasing chiral order. In this study, a Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm is introduced for sampling the posterior probability density function of the low-energy constants up to next-to-next-to-leading order. The results show that the sampling efficiency of the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm is significantly higher compared to another sampling algorithm. The study also finds that the next-to-next-to-leading order truncation error dominates the error budget.
The number of low-energy constants (LECs) in chiral effective field theory (chi EFT) grows rapidly with increasing chiral order, necessitating the use of Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques for sampling their posterior probability density function. For this we introduce a Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) algorithm and sample the LEC posterior up to next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in the two-nucleon sector of chi EFT. We find that the sampling efficiency of HMC is three to six times higher compared to an affine-invariant sampling algorithm. We analyze the empirical coverage probability and validate that the NNLO model yields predictions for two-nucleon scattering data with largely reliable credible intervals, provided that one ignores the leading-order EFT expansion parameter when inferring the variance of the truncation error. We also find that the NNLO truncation error dominates the error budget.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据