4.4 Article

microRNA Profile Associated with Positive Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

期刊

CURRENT ONCOLOGY
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 243-254

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29010023

关键词

miRNAs; cervical carcinoma; lymph node metastasis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to identify a subset of miRNAs related to lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early-stage cervical cancer (CC) patients. Microarray analysis identified 36 differentially expressed miRNAs in two patient groups, and the expression of seven miRNAs was validated. These findings help identify early-stage CC patients with LNM.
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important prognostic factor in cervical cancer (CC). In early stages, the risk of LNM is approximately 3.7 to 21.7%, and the 5-year overall survival decreases from 80% to 53% when metastatic disease is identified in the lymph nodes. Few reports have analyzed the relationship between miRNA expression and the presence of LNM. The aim of this study was to identify a subset of miRNAs related to LNM in early-stage CC patients. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were collected from patients with early-stage CC treated by radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy. We analyzed samples from two groups of patients-one group with LNM and the other without LNM. Global miRNA expression was identified by microarray analysis, and cluster analysis was used to determine a subset of miRNAs associated with LNM. Microarray expression profiling identified a subset of 36 differentially expressed miRNAs in the two groups (fold change (FC) >= 1.5 and p < 0.01). We validated the expression of seven miRNAs; miR-487b, miR-29b-2-5p, and miR-195 were underexpressed, and miR-92b-5p, miR-483-5p, miR-4534, and miR-548ac were overexpressed according to the microarray experiments. This signature exhibited prognostic value for identifying early-stage CC patients with LNM. These findings may help detect LNM that cannot be observed in imaging studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据