4.5 Article

α-cluster structure in 19F and 19Ne in resonant scattering

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 105, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.014615

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-SC0009883, DE-FG02-93ER40773]
  2. Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan [AP08052268]
  3. Nazarbayev University, the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan [SSH2020014, BR05236454]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nuclear structure of 19F and 19Ne is crucial for understanding alpha clustering in the A = 20 mass region and its relevance to astrophysics. By utilizing modern R-matrix analysis, this study assigns spins and specifies resonant parameters of levels up to 8.2 MeV in 19F based on old data and successfully fits recent data obtained through thick target inverse kinematics method. The comparison of isobaric mirror resonant reactions provides interesting insights into nuclear structure.
The nuclear structure of 19F and 19Ne is important for understanding of alpha clustering in the A = 20 mass region and in questions related to astrophysics. However, the only high-resolution broad angular and energy range study of the 19F resonance structure in alpha +15N scattering was published over 60 years ago, and a detailed analysis of complex excitation functions of overlapping resonances with several decay channels was simply impossible at that time. We performed a modern R-matrix analysis of these old data to assign spins and specify resonant parameters of levels up to excitation energy of 8.2 MeV in 19F. We successfully tested our R-matrix parameters in a fit of the recent data on alpha +15N obtained by thick target inverse kinematics (TTIK) method at 180 degrees. We used the new parameters for 19F to fit TTIK data for alpha+15O, the mirror resonant reactions. The comparison of the data for isobaric mirror resonant reactions provides an interesting insight into the nuclear structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据