4.7 Article

A Super-resolution Perception-based Incremental Learning Approach for Power System Voltage Stability Assessment with Incomplete PMU Measurements

期刊

出版社

CHINA ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INST
DOI: 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2020.05930

关键词

Data-driven; deep residual convolutional neural network; incremental broad learning; short-term voltage stability; super-resolution perception

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51807009, 71931003, 72061147004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a fully data-driven method for short-term voltage stability assessment of power systems with incomplete PMU measurements. The method uses a deep learning convolutional neural network to handle missing PMU measurements and employs incremental learning to update the model for better online performance. Unlike existing methods, this approach can fill missing data under various scenarios of PMU placement information loss and network topology changes. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms other methods in terms of accuracy and tolerance to missing data in STVS assessment.
This paper develops a fully data-driven, missing-data tolerant method for post-fault short-term voltage stability (STVS) assessment of power systems against the incomplete PMU measurements. The super-resolution perception (SRP), based on a deep residual learning convolutional neural network, is employed to cope with the missing PMU measurements. The incremental broad learning (BL) is used to rapidly update the model to maintain and enhance the online application performance. Being different from the state-of-the-art methods, the proposed method is fully data-driven and can fill up missing data under any PMU placement information loss and network topology change scenario. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method has the best performance in terms of STVS assessment accuracy and missing-data tolerance among the existing methods on the benchmark testing system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据