4.5 Article

Durability properties of mortars with fly ash containing recycled aggregates

期刊

ADVANCES IN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 101-111

出版社

TECHNO-PRESS
DOI: 10.12989/acc.2022.13.1.101

关键词

capillary coefficient; drying shrinkage; fly ash; mortar; rapid chloride permeability; recycled concrete aggregate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid development of the construction industry has led to increased consumption of aggregate resources, resulting in depletion of existing reserves. Using recycled aggregate in mortar production can reduce the use of natural materials and minimize demolition waste. The study found that increasing the use of recycled aggregate reduces the strength of mortar, but improves its abrasion resistance.
The rapid development of the construction industry in the world causes a rapid increase in the consumption of aggregate resources, which leads to the depletion of existing aggregate reserves. The use of recycled aggregate in the production of concrete and mortar may be a good solution to reduce the use of natural raw materials and to reduce demolition waste in the environment. In this study investigating the use of recycled aggregate in mortar production, mortar mixtures were produced by substituting 0%, 25%, 50% and 100% fine recycled aggregate (FRA) instead of natural aggregate. The effect of 20% and 40% fly ash (FA) substitutes on cement mortar performance was also investigated. Compressive and flexural strength, drying shrinkage, abrasion resistance, water absorption and capillary water absorption were investigated on the produced mortars. The increase in the use of FRA reduced the compressive and flexural strengths of mortars. While the capillarity coefficients, water absorption, rapid chloride permeability and drying shrinkage of the mortars increased with the increase in the use of FRA, the effect of the use of fly ash on the rate of increase remained lower. The increased use of FRA has improved abrasion resistance as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据