4.5 Article

One-Pot Ionic Liquid-Mediated Bioprocess for Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Rice Straw with Ionic Liquid-Tolerance Bacterial Cellulase

期刊

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9010017

关键词

biorefinery; cellulase; enzymatic hydrolysis; ionic liquid pretreatment; lignocellulose biomass; one-pot process

资金

  1. King Mongkut's University of Technology, North Bangkok [KMUTNB-FF-65-37]
  2. Srinakharinwirot University [583/2564]
  3. King Mongkut's University of Technology, North Bangkok

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a one-pot process combining IL pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification using low-toxic choline acetate ([Ch][OAc]) and IL-tolerant bacterial cellulases. The results showed that this method has the potential for high sugar production and further application in biorefining processes.
Ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment of lignocellulose is an efficient method for the enhancement of enzymatic saccharification. However, the remaining residues of ILs deactivate cellulase, therefore making intensive biomass washing after pretreatment necessary. This study aimed to develop the one-pot process combining IL pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification by using low-toxic choline acetate ([Ch][OAc]) and IL-tolerant bacterial cellulases. Crude cellulases produced from saline soil inhabited Bacillus sp. CBD2 and Brevibacillus sp. CBD3 were tested under the influence of 0.5-2.0 M [Ch][OAc], which showed that their activities retained at more than 95%. However, [Ch][OAc] had toxicity to CBD2 and CBD3 cultures, in which only 32.85% and 12.88% were alive at 0.5 M [Ch][OAc]. Based on the specific enzyme activities, the sugar amounts produced from one-pot processes using 1 mg of CBD2 and CBD3 were higher than that of Celluclast 1.5 L by 2.0 and 4.5 times, respectively, suggesting their potential for further application in the biorefining process of value-added products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据