4.5 Article

Understanding the Relationship between Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) and Criminal Justice: A Systematic Review

期刊

HEALTHCARE
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10010084

关键词

fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD); fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS); criminal justice; brain impairment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prenatal alcohol exposure is a major cause of preventable birth disorders and developmental delay worldwide. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is closely connected with criminal behavior. This systematic review provides up-to-date information on the relationship between FASD individuals and the criminal justice system and offers suggestions to reduce the public cost impact of FASD.
Prenatal alcohol exposure is considered one of the main causes of preventable birth disorders; however, it represents the main form of developmental delay in the world. Among the so-called secondary disabilities related to fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD), there is a close connection with criminal behavior. This systematic review aims to provide up-to-date information about the relationship between FASD subjects and criminal justice analyzing different aspects. In light of the results of this review, a further goal is to provide several suggestions in order to reduce the public cost impact of FASD. A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, producing 20 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Based on the results published in the selected studies, fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) is a leading cause of preventable birth disorders and developmental disabilities in newborns. Moreover, these subjects seem to be more inclined to criminal acts compared to others. In conclusion, it should be pointed out that FASD entails high public health costs, both regarding the support measures provided to the affected individual and to their family, as well as the cost and social impact of any criminal offenses committed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据