4.7 Article

Two-lane totally asymmetric simple exclusion process with extended Langmuir kinetics

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 105, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.105.014128

关键词

-

资金

  1. JST-Mirai Program [JPMJMI20D1]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP21H01570, JP21H01352]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a two-lane model with interactions between the lanes and investigates both bidirectional and unidirectional flows. Theoretical expressions for the global density of the system in the steady state are obtained through mean-field analyses, and it is found that the (2 x 2)-cluster mean-field analysis approximates the simulation results well. The phenomena are explained qualitatively through a simple analysis of correlations. These findings provide informative suggestions for actual traffic systems.
Multilane totally asymmetric simple exclusion processes with interactions between the lanes have recently been investigated actively. This paper proposes a two-lane model with extended Langmuir kinetics on a periodic lattice. Both bidirectional and unidirectional flows are investigated. In our model, the hopping, attachment, and detachment rates vary depending on the state of the corresponding site in the other lane. We obtain a theoretical expression for the global density of the system in the steady state from three kinds of mean-field analyses [(1 x 1)-, (2 x 1)-, and (2 x 2)-cluster cases]. We verify that the (2 x 2)-cluster mean-field analysis reproduces the differences between the two directional flows and approximates well the results of computer simulations for some cases. We observe that (2 x 1)-cluster mean-field analyses are already good approximations of the simulation results for unidirectional flows; on the other hand, the accuracy of the approximations much improves by (2 x 2)-cluster one for bidirectional flows. We explain the phenomena in a qualitative manner by a simple analysis of correlations. We expect these findings to give informative suggestions for actual traffic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据