4.8 Article

The anatomical placode in reptile scale morphogenesis indicates shared ancestry among skin appendages in amniotes

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 2, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1600708

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Geneva (Switzerland)
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (FNSNF) [31003A_140785, SINERGIA CRSII3_132430]
  3. SystemsX.ch initiative (project EpiPhysX)
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_140785] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most mammals, birds, and reptiles are readily recognized by their hairs, feathers, and scales, respectively. However, the lack of fossil intermediate forms between scales and hairs and substantial differences in their morphogenesis and protein composition have fueled the controversy pertaining to their potential common ancestry for decades. Central to this debate is the apparent lack of an anatomical placode (that is, a local epidermal thickening characteristic of feathers' and hairs' early morphogenesis) in reptile scale development. Hence, scenarios have been proposed for the independent development of the anatomical placode in birds and mammals and parallel co-option of similar signaling pathways for their morphogenesis. Using histological and molecular techniques on developmental series of crocodiles and snakes, as well as of unique wild-type and EDA (ectodysplasin A)-deficient scaleless mutant lizards, we show for the first time that reptiles, including crocodiles and squamates, develop all the characteristics of an anatomical placode: columnar cells with reduced proliferation rate, as well as canonical spatial expression of placode and underlying dermal molecular markers. These results reveal a new evolutionary scenario where hairs, feathers, and scales of extant species are homologous structures inherited, with modification, from their shared reptilian ancestor's skin appendages already characterized by an anatomical placode and associated signaling molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据