4.7 Article

Low latency detection of massive black hole binaries

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 105, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.044007

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA LISA foundation Science Grant [80NSSC19K0320]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the next decade, the launch of space-based gravitational wave detectors such as Taiji and TianQin is expected. These detectors aim to detect the merger of black holes with masses between 103 M0 and 108 M0, which may produce electromagnetic signals in addition to gravitational waves. Low latency detection of gravitational wave signals is crucial for capturing all phases of the emission and guiding the search for counterparts.
The next decade is expected to see the launch of one or more space-based gravitational wave detectors: Taiji and TianQin. One of the primary scientific targets for these missions is the merger of black holes with masses between 103 M0 and 108 M0. These systems may produce detectable electromagnetic signatures in addition to gravitational waves due to the presence of gas in minidisks around each black hole, and a circumbinary disk surrounding the system. The electromagnetic emission may occur before, during, and after the merger. In order to have the best chance of capturing all phases of the emission, it is imperative that the gravitational wave signals be detected at low latency and used to produce reliable estimates for the sky location and distance to help guide the search for counterparts. Low latency detection also provides a starting point for the global fit of the myriad signals that are simultaneously present in the data. Here, a low latency analysis pipeline is presented that is capable of analyzing months of data in just a few hours using a laptop from the last decade. The problem of performing a global fit is avoided by whitening out the bright foreground produced by nearby galactic binaries. The performance of the pipeline is illustrated using simulated data from the LISA Data Challenge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据