4.4 Article

Usefulness of physical function sub-item of SF-36 survey to predict exercise intolerance in patients with heart failure

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 174-177

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab052

关键词

Coronavirus disease 2019; Heart failure; Exercise intolerance; 6-Min walk distance; 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical functioning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of SF-36PF as a predictor of exercise intolerance in patients with HF and provide its optimal cut-off value. The results showed that SF-36PF is significantly associated with exercise intolerance and can be used as an alternative index for patients with HF.
Background Exercise intolerance is widely known to be a major cardinal symptom in patients with heart failure (HF), but due to the recent coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic, it is still difficult to directly measure exercise tolerance in many hospitals and facilities. The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical functioning (SF-36PF) pertain to lower extremity functioning and walking. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether SF-36PF is a useful predictor of exercise intolerance and to provide its optimal cut-off value for patients with HF. Methods and results SF-36PF and 6-min walking distance (6MWD) were evaluated in 372 consecutive patients with HF. Exercise intolerance was defined at 6MWD cut-offs of 200, 300, and 400 m. The addition of SF-36PF to the pre-existing determinants of exercise tolerance significantly improved the area under the curve scores (0.85 vs. 0.89, P = 0.011 for 6MWD <200 m; 0.90 vs. 0.93, P = 0.001 for 6MWD <300 m; 0.88 vs. 0.90, P = 0.021 for 6MWD <400 m) for the predictive effect on exercise intolerance. The cut-off values of SF-36PF for predicting exercise intolerance defined by 6MWD <200, 300, and 400 m were 45, 50, and 70, respectively. Conclusions SF-36PF is a useful tool as an alternative index to predict exercise intolerance in patients with HF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据