4.6 Article

Assessment of Aquatic Ecosystem Health with Indices of Biotic Integrity (IBIs) in the Ganjiang River System, China

期刊

WATER
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14030278

关键词

index of biotic integrity (IBIs); fish; benthic macroinvertebrate; phytoplankton; river health assessment

资金

  1. Basic Scientific Research Funds in National Nonprofit Institutes for Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences [2021-ZX-KTNBHT-0042]
  2. Biodiversity Investigation of Major Projects of Ministry of Ecology and Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed how the community structures of fish, macroinvertebrates, and plankton in the Ganjiang River system respond to environmental variables. Multiple indices of biotic integrity were applied to evaluate the health status of the aquatic ecosystem. The results showed that different indices indicated different health statuses and were influenced by different environmental factors. Comprehensive assessments based on multiple groups were found to better characterize the impacts of environmental pressures on water ecosystems.
Indices of biotic integrity (IBIs) are widely used to assess aquatic ecosystem health. However, there are few studies on their relationships. Based on fish, macroinvertebrate and plankton survey data collected in the Ganjiang River system from 2016 to 2017, redundancy analysis (RDA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) were used to analyze how the community structures of these organisms respond to environmental variables. The fish IBI (F-IBI), benthic macroinvertebrate IBI (B-IBI), and phytoplankton IBI (P-IBI) were applied to evaluate the health status of the aquatic ecosystem. A Kruskal-Wallis test (p < 0.05) and Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis were performed to evaluate the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of the results. Our results suggested that the F-IBI-, B-IBI-, and P-IBI-based assessments indicated good, fair, and healthy Ganjiang River system ecosystem health statuses, respectively, and significant differences existed among these indices (p < 0.05). The main environmental factors affecting F-IBI, B-IBI, and P-IBI were different. At the temporal scale, the F-IBI and B-IBI were stable, while the P-IBI fluctuated obviously. The consistency between the F-IBI and B-IBI results was better than that between each of these indices and the P-IBI results, and the consistency was better on a larger scale. These research results show that comprehensive assessments based on multiple groups rather than a single group can better characterize the impacts of environmental pressures on water ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据