4.6 Review

Treatment of the Immune-Related Adverse Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors A Review

期刊

JAMA ONCOLOGY
卷 2, 期 10, 页码 1346-1353

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1051

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Clinical and Translational Science Center at Weill Cornell Medical Center
  2. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) [UL1TR00457]
  3. MSKCC [UL1TR00457]
  4. Brian Piccolo Endowed Fellowship at MSKCC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IMPORTANCE The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) has significantly improved the treatment of a variety of cancers and led to US Food and Drug Administration approvals for patients with a variety of malignant neoplasms. Immune checkpoint inhibitors enhance antitumor immunity by blocking negative regulators of T-cell function that exist both on immune cells and on tumor cells. Although these agents can lead to remarkable responses, their use can also be associated with unique immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). OBSERVATIONS In general, use of PD-1 inhibitors such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab has a lower incidence of irAEs compared with those that block CTLA-4 such as ipilimumab. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab has a higher rate of irAEs than either approach as monotherapy. Consensus guidelines regarding the treatment of the most common irAEs including rash, colitis, hepatitis, endocrinopathies, and pneumonitis have been established. The mainstay of irAE treatment consists of immunosuppression with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressant agents such as infliximab; most irAEs will resolve with appropriate management. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The clinical use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is expanding rapidly. Oncology practitioners will therefore be required to recognize and manage irAEs in a growing patient population. Early recognition and treatment are essential to prevent patient morbidity and mortality, and adherence to established algorithms is recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据