4.2 Article

Self-testing two-qubit maximally entangled states from generalized Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt tests

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013049

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [PP00P2179109]
  2. Region Ile-de-France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Device-independent certification, also known as self-testing, aims to ensure the proper functioning of untrusted and uncharacterized devices. This paper demonstrates an improved self-testing approach for two-qubit maximally entangled states through a refined analysis of measurement statistics. By using suitably chosen Bell tests and observing correlations, higher fidelities can be concluded than previously known, even from correlations that cannot be exploited by a CHSH-based self-testing strategy.
Device-independent certification, also known as self-testing, aims at guaranteeing the proper functioning of untrusted and uncharacterized devices. For example, the quality of an unknown source expected to produce two-qubit maximally entangled states can be evaluated in a bipartite scenario, each party using two binary measurements. The most robust approach consists in deducing the fidelity of produced states with respect to a two-qubit maximally entangled state from the violation of the CHSH inequality. In this paper, we show how the self-testing of two-qubit maximally entangled states is improved by a refined analysis of measurement statistics. The use of suitably chosen Bell tests, depending on the observed correlations, allows one to conclude higher fidelities than ones previously known. In particular, nontrivial self-testing statements can be obtained from correlations that cannot be exploited by a CHSH-based self-testing strategy. Our results not only provide insight into the set of quantum correlations suited for self-testing, but also facilitate the experimental implementations of device-independent certifications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据