4.5 Article

What affects learner engagement in flipped learning and what predicts its outcomes?

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 211-228

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12717

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2017R1C1B2010469]
  3. Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to improve our understanding of flipped learning outcomes by examining factors of learner engagement, academic capability, and epistemological beliefs. The results indicate that both academic capability and epistemological beliefs have an impact on flipped learning outcomes.
The current popularity of flipped learning may be attributed to its reported successes in bringing about enhanced learner engagement and positive learning outcomes. This study aims to improve our understanding of flipped learning (FL) outcomes by examining factors of learner engagement, academic capability, and epistemological beliefs. Data were collected and statistically analyzed from 231 undergraduate students enrolled in a general biology or general chemistry course at a Korean university implemented with the FL model. The results indicated that learners' epistemological beliefs influenced neither pre-class nor in-class engagement, but that academic capability did affect both pre-class and in-class engagement. Only content/learning-related outcomes, not generic competencies or satisfaction, were affected by both academic capability and epistemological beliefs. Both pre-class and in-class engagement levels affected most types of FL outcomes except generic competencies, which were only affected by the extent of in-class engagement. Learners' affective engagement was not influenced by epistemological beliefs, but directly and indirectly affected FL outcomes via behavioral and cognitive engagement. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed along with recommendations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据