4.5 Article

Weakly Singular Symmetric Galerkin Boundary Element Method for Fracture Analysis of Three-Dimensional Structures Considering Rotational Inertia and Gravitational Forces

期刊

出版社

TECH SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2022.019160

关键词

Symmetric Galerkin boundary element method; rotational inertia; gravitational force; weak singularity; stress intensity factor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12072011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Symmetric Galerkin Boundary Element Method is advantageous for linear elastic fracture and crack growth analysis of solid structures. However, when engineering structures are subjected to body forces such as rotational inertia and gravitational loads, additional domain integral terms will require meshing of the interior of the domain. This study develops a weakly-singular SGBEM for fracture analysis of three-dimensional structures considering rotational inertia and gravitational forces, transforming the domain integral terms into boundary integrals.
The Symmetric Galerkin Boundary Element Method is advantageous for the linear elastic fracture and crackgrowth analysis of solid structures, because only boundary and crack-surface elements are needed. However, for engineering structures subjected to body forces such as rotational inertia and gravitational loads, additional domain integral terms in the Galerkin boundary integral equation will necessitate meshing of the interior of the domain. In this study, weakly-singular SGBEM for fracture analysis of three-dimensional structures considering rotational inertia and gravitational forces are developed. By using divergence theorem or alternatively the radial integration method, the domain integral terms caused by body forces are transformed into boundary integrals. And due to the weak singularity of the formulated boundary integral equations, a simple Gauss-Legendre quadrature with a few integral points is sufficient for numerically evaluating the SGBEM equations. Some numerical examples are presented to verify this approach and results are compared with benchmark solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据