4.4 Article

Complete genome sequence of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ST, a potential probiotic strain with antibacterial properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 183-186

出版社

KOREAN SOCIETY ANIMAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.5187/jast.2022.e7

关键词

Lactiplantibacilus plantarum; Pickled tea; Whole-genome sequencing; Probiotics; Feed

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31760448]
  2. Young Top-notch Talent of Yunnan Support Project for of High Level Talents [YNWR-QNBJ-2018-137]
  3. Yunnan Workstation of Sun Zhihong Expert [202105AF150055]
  4. Major project of Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia [2020ZD12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a potential probiotic strain L. plantarum ST was isolated from De'ang pickled tea in Yunnan Province, China, and its genome was fully sequenced and analyzed. The results showed that L. plantarum ST exhibited strong tolerance and antibacterial activity, indicating its potential application in animal breeding.
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (L. plantarum) ST was isolated from De'ang pickled tea in Yunnan Province, China. The genomes of strain ST were fully sequenced and analyzed using the PacBio RS II sequencing system. Our previous study has shown that L. plantarum ST is a potential probiotic strain. It had strong tolerance in the simulated artificial gastrointestinal tract, and in the antagonism tests, this strain showed strong antibacterial activity. Therefore, as a probiotic, it may be used in animal breeding. L. plantarum ST genome was composed of 1 circular chromosome and 7 plasmids. The length of the whole genome was 3320817 bp, and the annular chromosome size was 3058984 bp, guanine + cytosine (G +/- C) content (%) was 44.76%, which contained 2945 protein-coding sequences (CDS). This study will contribute to a further comprehensive understanding of L. Plantarum ST at the genomic level and provide a theoretical basis for its future application in animal breeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据