4.5 Article

Instigators of COVID-19 in Immune Cells Are Increased in Tobacco Cigarette Smokers and Electronic Cigarette Vapers Compared With Nonsmokers

期刊

NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 413-415

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab168

关键词

-

资金

  1. Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP) [TRDRP 28IR-0065]
  2. University of California Office of the President [R00RG2749]
  3. National Institute of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) University of California, Los Angeles Clinical and Translational Science Institute [L1TR001881]
  4. NIH [R01AG059501, R03AG059462]
  5. UCLA Center for AIDS Research [P30AI28697]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares the expression of key proteins in COVID-19 pathogenesis among tobacco cigarette smokers, electronic cigarette vapers, and non-smokers. The results show that tobacco cigarette smokers had a significantly higher percentage of cells positive for ACE2, TMPRSS2, and ADAM17 compared to non-smokers. The study also finds that electronic cigarette vapers have a trend towards increased proteases.
Introduction The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, gains entry into the host cell when its Spike protein is cleaved by host proteases TMPRSS2 and furin, thereby markedly increasing viral affinity for its receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2). In rodent and diseased human lungs, tobacco cigarette (TCIG) smoke increases ACE2, but the effect of electronic cigarette vaping (ECIG) is unknown. It is unknown whether nicotine (in both TCIGs and ECIGs) or non-nicotine constituents unique to TCIG smoke increase expression of key proteins in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Methods Immune (CD45(+)) cells collected before the pandemic in otherwise healthy young people, including TCIG smokers (n = 9), ECIG vapers (n = 12), or nonsmokers (NS) (n = 12), were studied. Using flow cytometry, expression of key proteins in COVID-19 pathogenesis were compared among these groups. Results TCIG smokers and ECIG vapers had similar smoking or vaping burdens as indicated by similar plasma cotinine levels. TCIG smokers compared with NS had a significantly increased percentage of cells that were positive for ACE2 (10-fold, p < .001), TMPRSS2 (5-fold, p < .001), and ADAM17 (2.5-fold, p < .001). Additionally, the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) consistently showed greater mean ACE2 (2.2-fold, p < .001), TMPRSS2 (1.5-fold, p < .001), furin (1.1-fold, p < .05), and ADAM17 (2-fold, p < .001) in TCIG smokers compared with NS. In ECIG vapers, furin MFI was increased (1.15-fold, p < .05) and TMPRSS2 MFI tended to be increased (1.1-fold, p = .077) compared with NS. Conclusions The finding that key instigators of COVID-19 infection are lower in ECIG vapers compared with TCIG smokers is intriguing and warrants additional investigation to determine if switching to ECIGs is an effective harm reduction strategy. However, the trend toward increased proteases in ECIG vapers remains concerning. Implications (1) This is the first human study to report a marked increase in proteins critical for COVID-19 infection, including ACE2, TMPRSS2, and ADAM17, in immune cells from healthy tobacco cigarette smokers without lung disease compared with e-cigarette vapers and nonsmokers. (2) These findings warrant additional investigation to determine whether switching to electronic cigarettes may be an effective harm reduction strategy in smokers addicted to nicotine who are unable or unwilling to quit. (3) The increase in proteases in electronic cigarette vapers remains concerning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据