4.6 Article

Preparation of Ag3PO4/α-Fe2O3 hybrid powders and their visible light catalytic performances

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 6328-6335

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra09256a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Program of Anhui Province [2019B11020040]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1808085MB40]
  3. National College Students Innovation Project [202111059024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly efficient photocatalyst consisting of Ag3PO4 and alpha-Fe2O3 hybrid powders was constructed for the treatment of rhodamine B. The hybrid material exhibited superior photocatalytic activity and stability.
The inefficiency of conventional photocatalytic treatment for removing rhodamine B is posing potential risks to ecological environments. Here, we construct a highly efficient photocatalyst consisting of Ag3PO4 and alpha-Fe2O3 hybrid powders for the treatment of rhodamine B. Ag3PO4 nanoparticles (nanoparticles, about 50 nm) are uniformly dispersed on the surface of alpha-Fe2O3 microcrystals (hexagonal sheet, about 1.5 mu m). The Ag3PO4-deposited uniformity on the alpha-Fe2O3 surface first increased, then decreased on increasing the hybrid ratio of Ag3PO4 to alpha-Fe2O3. When the hybrid ratio of Ag3PO4 to alpha-Fe2O3 is 1 : 2, the distribution of Ag3PO4 particles on the sheet alpha-Fe2O3 is more uniform with excellent Ag3PO4/alpha-Fe2O3 interface performance. The catalytic degradation efficiency of hybrids with the introduction of Ag3PO4 nanoparticles on the alpha-Fe2O3 surface reached 95%. More importantly, the hybrid material exhibits superior photocatalytic stability. Ag3PO4/alpha-Fe2O3 hybrids have good reusability, and the photocatalytic efficiency could still reach 72% after four reuses. The excellent photocatalytic activity of the as-prepared hybrids can be attributed to the heterostructure between Ag3PO4 and alpha-Fe2O3, which can effectively inhibit the photoelectron-hole recombination and broaden the visible light response range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据