4.2 Article

A novel nanomicelle composed from PEGylated TB di-peptide could be successfully used as a BCG booster

期刊

IRANIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 223-231

出版社

MASHHAD UNIV MED SCIENCES

关键词

Nanovaccine; Nasal and parenteral - immunization; Recombinant fusion - peptide; Self-assembled - nanomicelles; Tuberculosis

资金

  1. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study prepared a self-assembled nanomicelle as a potential vaccine candidate against tuberculosis. The nanomicelle was able to induce immune cell maturation and elicit both systemic and mucosal immune responses. The results suggest that the nanomicelle holds promise in boosting the efficacy of the BCG vaccine.
Objective(s): Tuberculosis affects one-third of the world's population and leads to a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Bacillus Chalmette-Guerin (BCG) as the only approved vaccine for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) does not show enough protection in the vaccinated population. Materials and Methods: The main aim of this study was to prepare a self-assembled nanomicelle composed from a di-block polymer in which, a difusion peptide was the hydrophobic block and polyethylene glycol (PEG) was the hydrophilic block. The micelles were characterized in vitro and in vivo as an antigen delivery system/adjuvant both with and without a prime BCG. Results: The micellar nanovaccine was able to elicit good dendritic cell maturation. Nanomicelles could efficiently induce systemic cytokines as well as nasal secretory predominant antibody titers (sIgA). The expression pattern of cytokines indicated the superiority of cellular immunity. Nasal administration of two doses of nanomicelles after a prime subcutaneous administration of BCG induced the highest mucosal and systemic immune responses. Conclusion: Based on our results PEG-HspX/EsxS self-assembled nanomicelle is highly immunogenic and can be considered a potential vaccine candidate against Mtb to boost BCG efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据