4.1 Article

Electron bunch profile reconstruction based on phase-constrained iterative algorithm

期刊

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.032801

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC UK) [ST/J002011/1, ST/M003590/1]
  2. Leverghulme Trust [IN-2015-012]
  3. Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres [VH-VI-503]
  4. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Material Command, USAF [FA8655-13-1-2141]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  6. STFC UK
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F048009/1, 1093881] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/P000967/1, ST/G008531/1, 1237217, ST/M003590/1, ST/J002011/1 John Adams Inst, John Adams Institute, ST/J002011/1, ST/K001582/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. EPSRC [EP/F048009/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. STFC [ST/G008531/1, John Adams Institute, ST/K001582/1, ST/M003590/1, ST/P000967/1, ST/J002011/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phase retrieval problem occurs in a number of areas in physics and is the subject of continuing investigation. The one-dimensional case, e.g., the reconstruction of the temporal profile of a charged particle bunch, is particularly challenging and important for particle accelerators. Accurate knowledge of the longitudinal (time) profile of the bunch is important in the context of linear colliders, wakefield accelerators and for the next generation of light sources, including x-ray SASE FELs. Frequently applied methods, e.g., minimal phase retrieval or other iterative algorithms, are reliable if the Blaschke phase contribution is negligible. This, however, is neither known a priori nor can it be assumed to apply to an arbitrary bunch profile. We present a novel approach which gives reproducible, most-probable and stable reconstructions for bunch profiles (both artificial and experimental) that would otherwise remain unresolved by the existing techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据