Long-term abundance trends of insect taxa are only weakly correlated

Changes in the abundances of animals, such as with the ongoing concern about insect declines, are often assumed to be general across taxa. However, this assumption is largely untested. Here, we used a database of assemblage-wide long-term insect and arachnid monitoring to compare abundance trends among co-occurring pairs of taxa. We show that 60% of co-occurring taxa qualitatively showed long-term trends in the same direction-either both increasing or both decreasing. However, in terms of magnitude, temporal trends were only weakly correlated (mean freshwater r = 0.05 (+/- 0.03), mean terrestrial r = 0.12 (+/- 0.09)). The strongest correlation was between trends of beetles and those of moths/butterflies (r = 0.26). Overall, even though there is some support for directional similarity in temporal trends, we find that changes in the abundance of one taxon provide little information on the changes of other taxa. No clear candidate for umbrella or indicator taxa emerged from our analysis. We conclude that obtaining a better picture of changes in insect abundances will require monitoring of multiple taxa, which remains uncommon, especially in the terrestrial realm.

Automated summary

Changes in animal abundances are often assumed to be general across taxa, but this assumption has not been properly tested. This study compared abundance trends among co-occurring pairs of insects and arachnids and found that while qualitative trends were similar, magnitudes of changes were weakly correlated. No clear umbrella or indicator taxa were identified. Monitoring multiple taxa is necessary to understand changes in insect abundances.