4.6 Review

Functionality and design of Co-MOFs: unique opportunities in electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 1723-1740

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cy00153e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC1908304]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676022, 21706004]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [BHYC1701A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ZIF-derived electrocatalysts, especially ZIF-67-based materials, have shown great potential for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in clean energy systems. This review summarizes the recent progress and strategies for designing more efficient catalysts based on ZIF-67, and discusses the remaining challenges and future perspectives in this field.
Zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF)-derived electrocatalysts have emerged as efficient, environmentally innocuous, low-cost, non-noble-metal alternatives to precious group metals for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and utilization in clean and sustainable energy systems such as metal-air batteries and fuel cells. Recently, there has been tremendous interest in ZIF-based materials due to the large N content and M-N bonds in the parent ZIF backbone and derived nanostructures, which are responsible for their high ORR catalytic activity. This review summarizes the origin of the activity of ZIF-based materials and their recent progress and focuses specifically on advancements in ZIF-67-based materials for efficient ORR electrocatalysis. Furthermore, this review also outlines the recent strategies for designing more efficient catalysts based on ZIF-67, such as doping with heteroatoms, alloying with various metallic species, and compositing with carbonaceous nanostructures, and discusses their underlying mechanisms. Finally, insight into the remaining challenges and directions for future perspectives and research is provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据