4.5 Article

Predicted global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and burden of melioidosis

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMICROBIOL.2015.8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [101103, 095066]
  2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1119467, OPP1106023, OPP1093011]
  3. RAPIDD programme of the Science & Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security
  4. Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health
  5. MRC [G1000803] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Burkholderia pseudomallei, a highly pathogenic bacterium that causes melioidosis, is commonly found in soil in Southeast Asia and Northern Australia(1,2). Melioidosis can be difficult to diagnose due to its diverse clinical manifestations and the inadequacy of conventional bacterial identification methods(3). The bacterium is intrinsically resistant to a wide range of antimicrobials, and treatment with ineffective antimicrobials may result in case fatality rates (CFRs) exceeding 70%(4,5). The importation of infected animals has, in the past, spread melioidosis to non-endemic areas(6,7). The global distribution of B. pseudomallei and the burden of melioidosis, however, remain poorly understood. Here, we map documented human and animal cases and the presence of environmental B. pseudomallei and combine this in a formal modelling framework(8-10) to estimate the global burden of melioidosis. We estimate there to be 165,000 (95% credible interval 68,000-412,000) human melioidosis cases per year worldwide, from which 89,000 (36,000-227,000) people die. Our estimates suggest that melioidosis is severely underreported in the 45 countries in which it is known to be endemic and that melioidosis is probably endemic in a further 34 countries that have never reported the disease. The large numbers of estimated cases and fatalities emphasize that the disease warrants renewed attention from public health officials and policy makers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据