4.6 Article

Environmental Quality and Compliance with Animal Welfare Legislation at Swedish Cattle and Sheep Farms

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14031095

关键词

biodiversity; farm animal; grassland; meat production; pasture; sustainability

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council Formas [2017-00698]
  2. Formas [2017-00698] Funding Source: Formas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the relationship between environmental quality and animal welfare on Swedish farms. The results showed that cattle farms that received agricultural environmental scheme (AES) payments for special value grasslands were more likely to comply with animal welfare standards. The presence of Natura 2000 habitats on cattle farms was also associated with higher compliance. However, these associations could not be observed in sheep farms.
Conflicts between different goals can obstruct progress in sustainability, but interests may also coincide. We evaluated relationships between environmental quality and animal welfare on Swedish farms with grazing livestock, using publicly available databases. Data were collected from 8700 official animal welfare inspections on 5808 cattle farms and 2823 inspections on 2280 sheep farms in 2012-2017. Compliance with three animal-based checkpoints was modeled using logistic regression, including a random farm effect to account for repeated inspections. Compliance was regressed on semi-natural grassland area, participation in the National Meadow and Pasture Inventory, Agri-Environmental Scheme (AES) grassland payments, presence of indicator plant species, and the presence of Natura 2000 habitats. Cattle farms complied more often if they received AES payments for grasslands of special values compared with if they did not apply for them (OR = 1.55-1.65; p <= 0.0001) and there was a similar tendency for cattle farms that applied for but were denied such payments (OR = 1.29; p = 0.074). There was also a strong tendency for Natura 2000 habitats on cattle farms to be associated with higher compliance (OR = 1.36; p = 0.059). These results suggest a direct or indirect causal effect of biodiversity on cattle welfare. The same associations could not be shown in sheep.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据