4.6 Article

A Review of End-Effector Research Based on Compliance Control

期刊

MACHINES
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/machines10020100

关键词

end-effector; compliance control; impedance control; hybrid force; position control; intelligent compliance control; mechanical structure; drive method; key technology

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [52075134]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [LH2019E062]
  3. Postdoctoral Scientific Research Developmental Fund of Heilongjiang Province of China [LBH-Q20097]
  4. Fundamental Research Foundation for Universities of Heilongjiang Province, China [LGYC2018JC040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes the design and research results of different end-effectors under impedance-based control, hybrid force/position control, and intelligent flexible control methods. Key techniques for achieving compliance control are derived by summarizing the research results, which provide methods and ideas for future research.
The end-effector is a key device for direct contact and operation between the operator and the workpiece, and its mechanical structure will directly affect the quality of the machine and expand its application. The theoretical research and technical implementation of the end-effector for compliance control are facing a lot of urgent challenges to be solved, therefore, the research results of active compliance control of robot end-effectors have a very broad application prospect. This paper describes the design and research results of different end-effectors under impedance-based control, hybrid force/position control, and intelligent flexible control methods, respectively. Under each control method, the structural characteristics and the optimized control scheme under different drives are introduced. Finally, key techniques for achieving compliance control are derived by summarizing, which broadens the engineering applications and provides methods and ideas for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据