4.5 Article

CozE is a member of the MreCD complex that directs cell elongation in Streptococcus pneumoniae

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.237

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01AI083365, CETR U19 AI109764, GM073831, RC2 GM092616]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most bacterial cells are surrounded by a peptidoglycan cell wall that is essential for their integrity. The major synthases of this exoskeleton are called penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs)(1,2). Surprisingly little is known about how cells control these enzymes, given their importance as drug targets. In the model Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli, outer membrane lipoproteins are critical activators of the class A PBPs (aPBPs)(3,4), bifunctional synthases capable of polymerizing and crosslinking peptidoglycan to build the exoskeletal matrix(1). Regulators of PBP activity in Gram-positive bacteria have yet to be discovered but are likely to be distinct due to the absence of an outer membrane. To uncover Gram-positive PBP regulatory factors, we used transposon-sequencing (Tn-Seq)(5) to screen for mutations affecting the growth of Streptococcus pneumoniae cells when the aPBP synthase PBP1a was inactivated. Our analysis revealed a set of genes that were essential for growth in wild-type cells yet dispensable when pbp1a was deleted. The proteins encoded by these genes include the conserved cell wall elongation factors MreC and MreD(2,6,7), as well as a membrane protein of unknown function (SPD_0768) that we have named CozE (coordinator of zonal elongation). Our results indicate that CozE is a member of the MreCD complex of S. pneumoniae that directs the activity of PBP1a to the midcell plane where it promotes zonal cell elongation and normal morphology. CozE homologues are broadly distributed among bacteria, suggesting that they represent a widespread family of morphogenic proteins controlling cell wall biogenesis by the PBPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据